The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Rodriguez-Acosta, 124 F.3d 214 (9th Cir. 1997):
Furthermore, "[o]n a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the standard of review is whether there is substantial evidence to support the conviction." United States v. Douglass, 780 F.2d 1472, 1476 (9th Cir.1986). There is.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.