California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mitchell, F067987 (Cal. App. 2015):
Evidence admissible to prove intent must only support the inference that the defendant probably possessed the same intent in each instance. (People v. Ewoldt, supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 402.) However, evidence relevant to prove identity requires the greatest degree of similarity between the charged and uncharged offense such that "'[t]he pattern and characteristics of the crimes must be so unusual and distinctive as to be like a signature.' [Citation.]" (People v. Ewoldt, supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 403.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.