The following excerpt is from United States v. Birkedahl, 973 F.3d 49 (2nd Cir. 2020):
Birkedahl first contends that the special condition requiring him to participate in a sex offense treatment program is erroneously vague as to the scope of the probation officer's supervisory role. He concedes that it is permissible for probation to have discretion over "administrative aspects of the treatment such as the selection of a provider and the schedule. " Birkedahl Br. at 22 (emphasis omitted) (quoting United States v. Maggese , 785 F. App'x 879, 881 (2d Cir. 2019) ). Nevertheless, Birkedahl
[973 F.3d 54]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.