California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Woods, 226 Cal.App.3d 1037, 277 Cal.Rptr. 269 (Cal. App. 1991):
6 We believe this disposition serves the ends of fairness and justice as well as of efficiency. (See e.g., People v. Riederer (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 829, 837, 266 Cal.Rptr. 355.) It should result in no prejudice to appellant who stands to receive a lesser conviction and the least severe punishment possible under the facts and law of this case. Nor will the prosecution be prejudiced. The People may, at their option, retry appellant on the greater charge if on remand they deem a new trial is warranted.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.