What is the plain view doctrine in the context of search and seizure cases?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Bazar, Case No.: 15-CR-499-BEN (S.D. Cal. 2015):
Under the plain-view doctrine, an officer may lawfully seize evidence without a warrant if the officer lawfully arrived at the place where the evidence could be plainly viewed, and the incriminating character of the evidence was immediately apparent. Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 135-36 (1990).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for plain view doctrine in the context of search and seizure cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the plain view doctrine in the context of a search and seizure? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the plain view doctrine in the context of search and seizure? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the search and seizure provisions of the fourth and fifth amendment apply in the context of searches and seizures? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the "plain view" doctrine in the context of drug seizure cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for qualified immunity in the context of a search of a home during which a police search resulted in a search warrant being issued for a drug dealer's home? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
First, what is the case law on the right of search and seizure of a suitcase in an inventory search? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for retroactivity in the context of search and seizure cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the exclusionary rule in search and seizure cases involving telephonic search warrant procedures? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a search conducted during search procedures during search and seizure was an intervening and superseding cause of criminal conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
