California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dason v. Arrieta, E066648 (Cal. App. 2018):
The limitations period for a fraud cause of action is three years from accrual. (Code Civ. Proc., 338, subd. (d).) However, "[t]he cause of action in that case is not deemed to have accrued until the discovery, by the aggrieved party, of the facts constituting the fraud . . . ." (Ibid.) "This discovery element has been interpreted to mean 'the discovery by the aggrieved party of the fraud or facts that would lead a reasonably prudent person to suspect fraud." (Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1423, 1430.)
Page 7
"'In order to rely on the discovery rule for delayed accrual of a cause of action, "[a] plaintiff whose complaint shows on its face that his claim would be barred without the benefit of the discovery rule must specifically plead facts to show (1) the time and manner of discovery and (2) the inability to have made earlier discovery despite reasonable diligence." [Citation.] In assessing the sufficiency of the allegations of delayed discovery, the court places the burden on the plaintiff to "show diligence"; "conclusory allegations will not withstand demurrer." [Citation.]'" (Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento, supra, 189 Cal.App.4th at p. 1430.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.