What is the legal test to obtain consent to search a hospital outpatient's Fourth Amendment rights?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Byrd, 113 Cal.Rptr. 777, 38 Cal.App.3d 941 (Cal. App. 1974):

As the trial court found, the evidence shows that defendant Byrd signed the conditions of release and acknowledged that he understood them and agreed to abide by them. The evidence further shows that all of the conditions of release were explained to defendant Byrd at or shortly after the time of his release. 2 The question posed by trial court below is whether the record must affirmatively show that the C.R.C. outpatient was specifically informed of his particular Fourth Amendment rights 'so that he could form an intelligent knowledge of the rights and also make an intelligent waiver' of the rights. In essence, the court below felt that something more than mere consent was needed for a waiver of Fourth Amendment rights; that something more was needed than a mere explanation that one must submit to a search of his or her person or property. Implicit in the court's question was whether an explanation of Fourth Amendment rights analogous to the admonition required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, is required before a C.R.C. outpatient can consent to warrantless searches.

Page 781

In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 248, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854, the court held that there is no requirement that one's Fourth Amendment rights be explained prior to obtaining consent to search. 3 The court distinguished the Miranda situation involving custodial [38 Cal.App.3d 947] interrogation from the Fourth Amendment situation. The court noted at pages 241--242, 93 S.Ct. at page 2055 that: 'There is a vast difference between those rights that protect a fair criminal trial and the rights guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment. Nothing, either in the purposes behind requiring a 'knowing' and 'intelligent' waiver of trial rights, or in the practical application of such a requirement suggests that it ought to be extended to the constitutional guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Other Questions


If the police violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights before obtaining consent, can the evidence obtained as a result of the search be suppressed? (California, United States of America)
Does the search and detention of a man under the Fourth Amendment violate his Fourth Amendment rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain advance consent to a warrantless search and waive his Fourth Amendment rights in exchange for the opportunity to avoid service of a state prison term? (California, United States of America)
Is the Fourth Amendment right to search a person's home without consent? (California, United States of America)
Does a Fourth Amendment balancing of the legitimate governmental interests in arrest against the reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment reveal the unreasonableness of a defendant's arrest and search? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where DNA obtained from a PAS device was obtained in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment right? (California, United States of America)
If a search warrant is obtained to search a house for shoes and/or clothes in connection with 5/9 Brims gang colors, is the search warrant supported by other lawfully obtained information? (California, United States of America)
Can a search warrant be used to search for marijuana and heroin in the bedroom of a defendant who had not consented to a search after his arrest? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply when an officer acting with objective good faith has obtained a search warrant for the search warrant under the Golden Gate Drive search warrant? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures as a condition of probation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.