The following excerpt is from Demuniz v. Oregon Parole Bd., 21 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 1994):
A second petition for habeas corpus relief is procedurally barred if "new and different grounds are alleged, [and] the judge finds that the failure of the petitioner to assert those grounds in a prior petition constituted an abuse of the writ." Rule 9(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 cases, 28 U.S.C. fol. Sec. 2254 (1982). A petitioner may abuse the writ by raising a claim in a second or subsequent petition for habeas corpus that he could have raised in the first petition. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 488 (1991). The government bears the burden on pleading abuse of the writ. Id. at 494.
The government may meet this burden by noting the petitioner's prior writ history, identifying the claims that appear for the first time, and alleging abuse of the writ. Id. The burden then shifts to the petitioner to disprove abuse of the writ, which can be done only by showing cause for failing to raise the claim in an earlier petition, and prejudice resulting therefrom. Id.; Harris v. Vasquez, 949 F.2d 1497, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1275 (1992).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.