What is the legal standard for admissibility of third party culpability evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Washington, B281901 (Cal. App. 2019):

meet the legal standard for admissibility of third party culpability evidence set forth in People v. Hall (1986) 41 Cal.3d 826 (Hall). However, the court also ruled the prosecution would be precluded from arguing there was a modus operandi or that the robberies were so unique and similar that only defendant could have committed them.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff sue a producer who has complied with third party standards but was found guilty of misrepresentation or breach of warranty because, in someone's opinion, the third-party standards were lax? (California, United States of America)
Is third party culpability evidence admissible in cases where a victim has disappeared? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible third party culpability evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Is third party culpability evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible third-party culpability evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is third-party culpability evidence admissible on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for presenting evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of third-party intimidation evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling excluding third party culpability evidence reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for presenting evidence of third party culpability in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.