The following excerpt is from United States v. Chao Fan Xu, D.C. No. 2:02-CR-00674-PMP-LRL-1, D.C. No. 2:02-CR-00674-PMP-LRL-2, D.C. No. 2:02-CR-00674-PMP-LRL-3, D.C. No. 2:02-CR-00674-PMP-LRL-4, No. 09-10189, No. 09-10193, No. 09-10201, No. 09-10202 (9th Cir. 2013):
Defendants invoke necessity without proper legal basis. Fear of prosecution for crimes committed is not an appropriate reason to claim necessity. Cf. United States v. Schoon, 971 F.2d 193, 196-97 (9th Cir. 1991) (discussing permissible uses of the necessity defense in cases such as: prisoners escaping a burning prison, a person stealing food from a cabin to survive if lost in the woods, and destruction of property to prevent the spread of fire).
Page 40
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.