California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Nally v. Grace Community Church, 253 Cal.Rptr. 97, 47 Cal.3d 278, 763 P.2d 948 (Cal. 1988):
Recently, an additional reason for declining to apply the doctrine was announced in Searle v. Allstate Life Ins. Co. (1985) 38 Cal.3d 425, 212 Cal.Rptr. 466, 696 P.2d 1308, in which we held: "The primary purpose served by the law-of-the-case rule is one of judicial economy. Finality is attributed to an initial appellate ruling so as to avoid the further reversal and proceedings on remand that would result if the initial ruling were not adhered to in a later
Page 112
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.