California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hill, A157209 (Cal. App. 2020):
As mentioned above, neither appointed counsel nor defendant has identified any issue for our review. Upon our own independent review of the entire record, we agree none exists. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436; Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744.) The jury's findings were amply supported by the evidence produced at trial, including the testimony of both
Page 4
A.B. and T.H. describing defendant's closed-fist attack on A.B. and his subsequent slashing of her tire. (See People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1, 11 [" ' " ' "If the circumstances reasonably justify the trier of fact's findings, the opinion of the reviewing court that the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding does not warrant a reversal of the judgment" ' " ' "].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.