The following excerpt is from Dittmar v. Berryhill, No. 2:15-cv-1630 DB (E.D. Cal. 2017):
and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence in the case record, it will be given controlling weight."); Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 833 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Occasional symptom-free periodsand even the sporadic ability to workare not inconsistent with disability.").
Accordingly, the court finds that the government has failed to show that its position was substantially justified.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.