The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Contreras, 116 F.3d 486 (9th Cir. 1997):
Contreras contends that the district court improperly applied a two-level enhancement to his sentence for possession of a dangerous weapon and argues that recent cases require a closer nexus between the weapon and the offense other than mere possession. We review de novo a district court's interpretation of the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Shrestha, 86 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.