What is the general rule of Albers and the policy underlying former section 14 of the article I?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Locklin v. City of Lafayette, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 613, 7 Cal.4th 327, 867 P.2d 724 (Cal. 1994):

The general rule of Albers and the policy underlying former section 14 of article I were reaffirmed in Holtz v. Superior Court, supra, 3 Cal.3d 296, 303, 90 Cal.Rptr. 345, 475 P.2d 441:

Other Questions


Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 30(e) of the US Constitution on the grounds that the provisions of article 30(E) of Section 50(e of the Civil Rights Act are invalid? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered section 954 of the Criminal Code when sentencing a defendant under section 654 under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1192.7(c)(7) of the California Three Strikes Act, or does the Attorney General's interpretation of section 667.5(c))(7(b)(7)? (California, United States of America)
Can Respondents who have not been charged with violating a section of the obscenity ordinance, such as the "obscene" section, attack the section in the disjunctive? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.