The following excerpt is from Calcano-Martinez v. Imm'n & Nat'n Serv., 232 F.3d 328 (2nd Cir. 1999):
We reasoned, however, that all review had not been eliminated by INA 242(g) or the AEDPA. See id. Relying on the doctrine articulated in Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 659-61
Page 334
(1996), that repeal by implication of the right to petition for habeas corpus relief is disfavored, we held that:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.