The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Croasmun, 885 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1989):
Croasmun also contends that, based on Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 (1987), the court's ruling effectively deprived him of his constitutional right to testify. This contention lacks merit.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.