California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kilpatrick v. Beebe, 219 Cal.App.3d 1527, 269 Cal.Rptr. 52 (Cal. App. 1990):
Nothing in the language of section 664.6 suggests it was intended to be exclusive. Rather, it appears to do nothing more than provide a streamlined method for reducing a stipulated settlement to judgment. As this court observed in City of Fresno v. Maroot (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 755, 234 Cal.Rptr. 353:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.