California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nicolaus, 286 Cal.Rptr. 628, 54 Cal.3d 551, 817 P.2d 893 (Cal. 1991):
He argues that instructing the jury to "simply" determine under the relevant evidence which penalty is justified "trivialized the enormity of the sentencing task and undermined the jury's sense of responsibility and gravity about its role." We have recently rejected the identical claim, finding that the instruction's utilization of the adverb "simply" merely "describe[s] the mechanics of the jury's normative process." (People v. Cox (1991) 53 Cal.3d 618, 680, 280 Cal.Rptr. 692, 809 P.2d 351; People v. Sully (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1195, 1243, 283 Cal.Rptr. 144, 812 P.2d 163.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.