The following excerpt is from Wilkinson v. Gingrich, No. 13-56952 (9th Cir. 2015):
For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the state court unreasonably applied the rule of collateral estoppel, as clearly established in Ashe v. Swenson, when it upheld Wilkinson's perjury conviction. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court granting Wilkinson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.