The following excerpt is from U.S. v. California, 921 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2019):
Subsequently, the district court ruled on California's motion to dismiss, issuing an order consistent with its conclusions as to the preliminary injunction. United States v. California (California II ), No. 2:18-cv-490-JAM-KJN, 2018 WL 3361055, at *1 (E.D. Cal. July 9, 2018). This timely appeal followed.
We review a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion. Epona v. County of Ventura , 876 F.3d 1214, 1219 (9th Cir. 2017). "Our review is limited and deferential. The district court's interpretation of the underlying legal principles, however, is subject to
[921 F.3d 878]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.