The following excerpt is from USA. v. Sayakhom, 186 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 1999):
6. Sayakhom renewed her motion for judgment of acquittal after the close of evidence. Consequently, she preserved the right to test the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. See United States v. Bancalari, 110 F.3d 1425, 1428 (9th Cir. 1997).
6. Sayakhom renewed her motion for judgment of acquittal after the close of evidence. Consequently, she preserved the right to test the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. See United States v. Bancalari, 110 F.3d 1425, 1428 (9th Cir. 1997).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.