The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Short, 857 F.2d 1479 (9th Cir. 1988):
Because both the indictment and bill of particulars (1) sufficiently apprised Short of the charges against him so as to enable him to prepare for trial and not be misled or unfairly surprised at trial and (2) protected against any double jeopardy, any supposed variance has not prejudiced his substantial rights. See United States v. Anton, 547 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir.1976). Accordingly, we find that the district court did not err.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.