What is the effect of a determinate sentencing scheme on a defendant's right to a jury trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Choice, D057064 (Cal. App. 2011):

the jury. Under the amended determinate sentencing law sentencing scheme employed by the trial court ( 1170), the trial court was free to rely on any relevant factors in choosing the lower, middle or upper term and was not required to impose the middle term in the absence of mitigating or aggravating factors. (People v. Sandoval (2007) 41 Cal.4th 825, 844.) This sentencing scheme does not implicate a defendant's right to a jury trial. (Ibid.) Thus, in relying on factors supported by the record and relevant to the crime, the trial court did not infringe upon Choice's right to a jury trial. (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Does a judge who sentenced a defendant to a determinate and indeterminate sentence need to serve the determinate sentence equally? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
How is a determinate term sentence applied to a defendant who has been convicted of multiple crimes calling for determinate sentences? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who committed a crime under a different sentencing scheme that existed at the time he committed the crime be sentenced to a different sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does section 669 of the California Criminal Code apply to determine whether a determinate or determinate sentence should run concurrently with an indeterminate sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of a court in sentencing a defendant to a sentence that is within the legislatively determined limits of a criminal sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a comparative sentence review equivalent to that provided for determinately sentenced felons under the "disparate sentence" statute? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's history of violence relevant to the sentencing of a defendant in a capital sentencing trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.