The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Ylst, 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996):
We review de novo the denial of a habeas petition. Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994). The district court's factual findings, however, are reviewed for clear error, Thomas v. Brewer, 923 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.1991), and the state court's factual determinations are presumed correct. 28 U.S.C. 2254(d).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.