California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Romero, F073111 (Cal. App. 2018):
Defendant now contends the parole revocation restitution fine ( 1202.45) must be stricken, because his sentence does not include the possibility of parole. The Attorney General agrees. The parties are correct. (People v. Oganesyan (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1183; cf. People v. Brasure (2008) 42 Cal.4th 1037, 1075.)19
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.