What is the duty of a trial judge to give instructions on particular defenses and their relevance to the charged offense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rosenkrantz, 198 Cal.App.3d 1187, 244 Cal.Rptr. 403 (Cal. App. 1988):

It is also well established that "the duty to give instructions, sua sponte, on particular defenses and their relevance to the charged offense arises only if it appears that the defendant is relying on such a defense, or if there is substantial evidence supportive of such a defense and the defense is not inconsistent with the defendant's theory of the case. Indeed, this limitation on the duty of the trial court is necessary not only because it would be unduly burdensome to require more of trial judges, but also because of the potential prejudice to defendants if instructions were given on defenses inconsistent with the theory relied upon." (People v. Sedeno (1974) 10 Cal.3d 703, 716, 112 Cal.Rptr. 1, 518 P.2d 913.)

Other Questions


Is it instructional error to instruct a jury in a trial trial on a defense that is not relevant to the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by instructing the jury on self-defense and by declining to give the jury instructions on the lesser related charge of being an accessory after the fact? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to instruct a defendant on certain defenses and their relevance to the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does the law of the case doctrine preclude a litigant from seeking a writ of appeal against a finding that the trial judge was an impartial judge who failed to instruct on lesser included offenses? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the duty of a trial court to instruct a jury on the general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.