The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Bravo-Morales, 869 F.2d 1498 (9th Cir. 1989):
A single conspiracy may contain subgroups and subagreements; the evidence need not exclude every hypothesis but that of a single conspiracy. Patterson, 819 F.2d at 1502; see United States v. Smith, 790 F.2d 789, 795 (9th Cir.1986) (separate acts at separate times does not mean separate conspiracies).
In this circuit, a factors analysis has been used to distinguish single from multiple conspiracies. United States v. Bibbero, 749 F.2d 581, 587 (9th Cir.1984). The relevant factors include the nature of the scheme; the identity of the participants; the quality, frequency and duration of each conspirator's transactions; and the commonality of time and goals. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.