California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hubbart v. Superior Court, 50 Cal.App.4th 1155, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 268 (Cal. App. 1996):
Further, we believe petitioner may have misconstrued the "deterrent" effect of a statute as that term is understood in the law. Certainly confining petitioner for treatment will have a deterrent effect upon him personally, as he will be unable to commit sexually violent crimes upon women in the community. A deterrent measure, however, is one which serves as a threat of negative repercussions to discourage other people from engaging in certain behavior. (See, e.g., Artway v. Attorney General of State of N.J. (1996) 81 F.3d 1235, 1255.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.