What is the current state of the law with respect to the seizure of child pornography by police?

"On the other side of the equation, law enforcement's interests [in seizing appellant's computer] were . . . strong," in that the police had probable cause to believe it contained evidence of child pornography. (United States v. Burgard, supra, 675 F.3d at p. 1034.) Child pornography is not only a reprehensible offense in and of itself, it "is proximately linked to the sexual abuse of children [citation], 'a most serious crime and an act repugnant to the moral instincts of a decent people' [citation.]" (In re Grant (2014) 58 Cal.4th 469, 477.) It cannot be gainsaid that the police were pursuing an important governmental interest in this case.