What is the current state of the law on unduly prejudicial evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Carranza, G055902 (Cal. App. 2019):

The court did not abuse its discretion. Evidence is unduly prejudicial where it tends "to evoke an emotional bias against a party because of extraneous factors unrelated to the issues." (People v. Cortez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 101, 128.) Here, evidence that A.C. may have accused her father of physical abuse was tangential and, as the prosecutor indicated, would have resulted in a time consuming mini-trial.

Other Questions


What is the current state of California Evidence Code section 356, which prohibits the use of "self-serving or self-serving" statements in evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law in cases where unprotested evidence is a dominant part of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on misconduct when a prosecutor makes a closing argument stating facts that are not in evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on prejudicial evidence in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on discretion of the trial court in assessing the probative value of evidence under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Evidence Code section 356, which prohibits the use of "self-serving or self-serving" statements in evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the interpretation of evidence section 356 of the Alberta Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law in Ontario on the interpretation of the evidence under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the interpretation of evidence under the Evidence Code section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the right of a trial court to exclude or admit relevant evidence under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.