California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gurley, 100 Cal.Rptr. 407, 23 Cal.App.3d 536 (Cal. App. 1972):
In Chambers v. Maroney, supra, the court pointed out that given probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained articles which the officers were entitled to seize, '. . . if an effective search is to be made at any time, either the search must be made immediately without a warrant or the car itself must be seized and held without a warrant for whatever period is necessary to obtain a warrant for the search.' (399 U.S. at p. 51, fn. omitted, 90 S.Ct. p. 1981.) The court resolved this dilemma as follows: 'For constitutional purposes, we see no difference between on the one hand seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant. Given probable cause to search, either course is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.' (Id., at p. 52, 90 S.Ct. p. 1981.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.