What is the current state of the law on the basis of factual findings on a suppression motion?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Prieto-Villa, 910 F.2d 601 (9th Cir. 1990):

Prior to 1975, Rule 12 contained no such requirements. Therefore, cases before that date held that factual findings were not mandatory, though we sometimes noted their importance or remanded for factual findings. For example, in United States v. Heimforth, 493 F.2d 970 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 908, 94 S.Ct. 1615, 40 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974), we held that while factual findings were not required on every suppression motion, trial courts ought to make them when the issue was a "delicate" one such as voluntariness of consent to a search. Id. at 972. The only means of ensuring that trial courts performed the weighing required by a "totality of circumstances" test was to require explicit factual findings on the issue. Id. See also United States v. Miner, 484 F.2d 1075, 1077 (9th Cir.1973) (factual findings not universally required, but case remanded for further factual findings).

Other Questions


What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a motion to dismiss a preliminary injunction has been granted by the Court of Appeal, when the motion is also dismissed by the District Court on the basis of a failure to exhaust tribal remedies, does the motion merge into the final judgment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a suppression motion be denied on the grounds that neither severability nor plain view doctrine support denial of the suppression motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
On what basis can a motion be dismissed on the basis that the motion is invalid? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on suppression of evidence in civil cases where the suppression was not deliberate in either of the senses of deliberation or deliberate misconduct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion to vacate the conviction of a defendant for failing to read the elements of the crime in the allocution, what is the current state of the law on this basis? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on a motion to suppress? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a suppression motion be denied on the grounds that neither severability nor plain view doctrine support denial of the suppression motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.