The following excerpt is from United States v. Gainza, 982 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 2020):
Typical proof that a defendant obtained account numbers includes evidence that a defendant possessed cards or a document or digital file containing account numbers. See, e.g. , United States v. Onyesoh , 674 F.3d 1157, 1158 (9th Cir. 2012) (defendant in possession of a spreadsheet containing 500 credit card numbers); United States v. Gaussiran , 2018 WL 6528006, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2018) (defendant in possession of sixty credit and debit cards). Another way of proving stolen accounts is through evidence that the defendant used account numbers. See, e.g. , United States v. Alisuretove , 788 F.3d 1247, 1250 (10th Cir. 2015) (defendants made withdrawals from approximately 524 account numbers that had been obtained with a skimmer). And, of course, there may be other avenues of proof, such as expert testimony about the efficacy of a certain type of skimmer or the bank's experience in similar digital heists. Such evidence might bridge the gap between proof of trying and proof of succeeding.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.