The following excerpt is from Norwood v. Cate, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00330-AWI-GBC PC (E.D. Cal. 2012):
Neither party addresses the following apparent issue: whether, absent exigent circumstances, when prison officials choose to fulfil their constitutional duty to protect inmates in a matter which compromises their constitutional duty to ensure adequate exercise, have prison officials violated the inmates' Eighth Amendment right to exercise. See Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 733-734 (recognizing a higher culpable standard to find a constitutional violation when exigent circumstances necessitate "split-second, life-and-death decisions"). Due to prison overcrowding, frequent and severe prison violence has become more common than extraordinary, and the use of lockdowns to
Page 34
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.