The following excerpt is from United States v. Jacques, No. 10-3677(L), No. 11-1083, No. 11-1083(CON), No. 11-1099(CON), No. 11-1146(CON) (2nd Cir. 2014):
6.7(d), at 567 (2d ed. 1999)). Thus, the only statement whose admission appears to have violated Miranda is the last. As the government concedes, Campaneria v. Reid, 891 F.2d 1014, 1021-22 (2d Cir. 1989), holds that once a defendant has invoked the right to counsel, police statements aimed at changing a defendant's mind on that subject violate Miranda, rendering statements elicited thereby inadmissible.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.