What is the case law in favour of a jury infering defendant was not a mere bystander in a motor vehicle accident?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wightman, G048154 (Cal. App. 2014):
Taken as a whole, it was more than reasonable for the jury to infer defendant was not a mere bystander, and her reliance on People v. Hill (1946) 77
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Does a "driver" for purposes of Vehicle Code section 20002 include an owner of a vehicle involved in a accident when the owner is also a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant give a mistake of fact jury instruction in a motor vehicle accident trial where he got into the victims' vehicle because he thought it was his black SUV? (California, United States of America)
What evidence supports the inference that a defendant or his companion knew the vehicle contained police officers until the vehicle was identified as a police vehicle? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case to argue that the accident was not a crime? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury presume defendant was aware of the risk of a motor vehicle accident prior to the accident? (California, United States of America)
