The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Motley, 655 F.2d 186 (9th Cir. 1982):
1 If the government increases the severity of the charges following a defendant's exercise of a procedural right, the sequence of events gives rise to an appearance of vindictiveness, shifting the burden to the government to prove that the decision to re-indict with more severe charges did not result from any vindictive motive. "Instead, the prosecutor, to rebut the presumption, must show his decision to re-indict with more severe charges was 'justified by independent reasons or intervening circumstances which dispel the appearance of vindictiveness.' " United States v. Burt, 619 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1980), quoting United States v. Griffin, 617 F.2d at 1347.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.