California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. Grant Hotel Ventures, LLC v. Am. Prop. Mgmt. Corp., D066490 (Cal. App. 2016):
"The party claiming to be a third party beneficiary bears the burden of proving that the contracting parties actually promised the performance which the third party beneficiary seeks. This remains largely a question of interpreting the written contract." (Loduca v. Polyzos (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 334, 341.) While third party beneficiary status is often a question of fact, where "the issue can be answered by interpreting the contract as a whole and doing so in light of the uncontradicted evidence . . . the issue becomes one of law that we resolve
Page 9
independently." (Prouty v. Gores Technology Group (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1233.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.