The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Benitez-Mendez, 89 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 1996):
There is no question that the government proved the existence of a conspiracy to sell cocaine: an undercover officer made numerous purchases of cocaine from the conspirators. "Once the existence of a conspiracy is shown, the government need only prove a slight connection between the defendant and the conspiracy." United States v. Matta-Ballesteros, 71 F.3d 754, 765 (9th Cir.1995). If that burden is met, a conspirator is liable for all foreseeable substantive offenses committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.