What is the burden of proof for a motion where the motionant has to prove that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Roe ex rel. Callahan v. GUSTINE UNIFIED SCHOOL, 678 F. Supp.2d 1008 (E.D. Cal. 2009):
Where the movant will have the burden of proof on an issue at trial, it must "affirmatively demonstrate that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party." Soremekun v. Thrifty
[678 F. Supp.2d 1017]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden of proof against a party who has not been able to prove that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the non-moving party have the burden of proof against the moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the court has found that if a party is not moving, can the nonmoving party continue to sue the moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a motion to evict a non-moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the burden of proving a claim against a party be burdens of proof? ("New York", United States of America)
In what circumstances will a non-moving party have the burden of proving that there is insufficient evidence to support their claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof for a moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving communication between a party and party? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard for a motion to dismiss a motion brought by a non-moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that the non-moving party has a valid claim against the moving party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
