What is the burden of establishing that a party is entitled to relief under section 473(b)?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Calderon v. Koutsoukos, B304126 (Cal. App. 2021):
A moving party bears the burden of establishing that he or she is entitled to relief under section 473(b) by a preponderance of the evidence. (Luz v. Lopes (1960) 55 Cal.2d 54, 62.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a party's failure to file a declaration in a personal injury action relieve the moving party of the burden of establishing the evidentiary facts of every element necessary to entitle him to judgment? (California, United States of America)
Is a party seeking relief from default based solely on section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure entitled to equitable relief? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing that a party defending against a motion of no confidence has the burden to establish that the motion is a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party has a burden of burden on moving parties? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing entitlement to relief? (California, United States of America)
Does an inmate have to seek relief under section 1170.18 of the Penal Code while an appeal is pending concerning denial of relief under the same section? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a party has met the moving party's burden? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a fair cross section section in a jury selection process? (California, United States of America)
Is Purchaser's argument that section 473(b) mandatory relief in a medical malpractice case is inapplicable? (California, United States of America)
