The following excerpt is from Gane v. United States, 13-1166-cr, 13-1195-cr, 13-214-cr (2nd Cir. 2014):
1. "A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence bears a heavy burden, because the reviewing court is required to draw all permissible inferences in favor of the government and resolve all issues of credibility in favor of the jury verdict." United States v. Kozeny, 667 F.3d 122, 139 (2d Cir. 2011). We "must affirm the conviction if any rational trier of fact could have found
Page 3
the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.