The following excerpt is from Chung v. Golden (In re Golden), Adv. Pro. No. 11-2741, Case No. 10-38007-E-7, Docket Control No. KY-1 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2013):
While Plaintiffs argue that under the principles enunciated in Otto v. Niles (In re Niles) , 106 F.3d 1465 (9th Cir. 1997), once the use of entrusted money is shown, then the burden shifts to the fiduciary to show that the use was not improper. However, this claim is premised on there being a partnership, which the court cannot determine on this summary judgment motion based on the evidence presented.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.