What is the appellant's burden to establish error based on the appellate record?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, A155671 (Cal. App. 2020):
It is appellant's burden to establish error based on the appellate record. We review the trial court's resolution of disputed facts for substantial evidence and review de novo whether, based on the facts, the challenged statement was legally obtained. (People v. Smith (2007) 40 Cal.4th 483, 502.)
1. Custody
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of an appellant to provide an adequate record to permit review of a claimed error? (California, United States of America)
What is the appellant's burden of demonstrating prejudicial error to the appellate court? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing that a party defending against a motion of no confidence has the burden to establish that the motion is a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of providing an adequate record and demonstrating error from a recording of a 911 call? (California, United States of America)
What is the appellant's burden to provide an adequate record for appellate review of his claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that an appellant has an adequate record to Page 5 support their claim of error? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden on the appellant to provide an adequate record to permit review of a claimed error? (California, United States of America)
If the record is silent and the appellant has failed to sustain his burden of proving error, what is the test for striking a prior felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
