The following excerpt is from Singh v. Barr, 18-1496 NAC (2nd Cir. 2020):
credibility determination and call into question Singh's credibility as a whole. See id. (determining that "dramatically different" accounts of incident are substantial evidence for adverse credibility determination); see also Siewe v. Gonzales, 480 F.3d 160, 170 (2d Cir. 2007) ("[A] single false document or a single instance of false testimony may (if attributable to the petitioner) infect the balance of the alien's uncorroborated or unauthenticated evidence.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.