What is sufficient corroborating evidence to sustain the conviction of a convicted burglar for running and hiding from the police?

running and hiding from the police. That was sufficient corroborating evidence to sustain the conviction. (See Mendoza, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 176 [evidence that the defendant possessed property taken from businesses in Chinatown the same morning as the burglaries along with the defendant's statement that he had " 'been to Chinatown' " to explain where he obtained the property was sufficient to deny a motion for acquittal]; People v. Smithey (1999) 20 Cal.4th 936, 982-983 [flight alone is not sufficient to establish guilt, but may be considered as evidence of consciousness of guilt].)

3. Rodriguez Forfeited His Prosecutorial Misconduct Claim by Failing to Object to the Prosecutor's Challenged Statements