California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sabino, 215 Cal.App.2d 149, 30 Cal.Rptr. 110 (Cal. App. 1963):
Reasonable cuase is generally defined as a state of facts that would lead a man of ordinary care and prudence to believe and entertain an honest suspicion that a person is guilty of a crime. (People v. Ingle, 53 Cal.2d 407, 412, 2 Cal.Rptr. 14, 348 P.2d 577.)
The question of whether an officer may stop to interrogate the occupants of a vehicle is a separate issue from whether there is a right to search and arrest the occupants. (People v. King, 175 Cal.App.2d 386, 390, 346 P.2d 235.)
As stated in People v. Ellsworth, 190 Cal.App.2d 844, 846-847, 12 Cal.Rptr. 433, 435, 'The courts of this state consistently have adhered to the proposition that a police officer may question a person outdoors at night when the circumstances are such as would indicate to a reasonable man in like position that such a course is necessary to the discharge of his duties [citations], particularly when the person to be interrogated is parked in an automobile on a secluded highway * * *. [Citation.]'
[215 Cal.App.2d 153] The reasons required to permit questioning are necessarily much less than would be required to permit arrest and search. (People v. Davis, 188 Cal.App.2d 718, 722, 10 Cal.Rptr. 610.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.