What is a reasonable time, what is the appropriate amount of time, and how should the courts consider?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Chapin v. Superior Court of Tuolumne County, 234 Cal.App.2d 571, 44 Cal.Rptr. 496 (Cal. App. 1965):
In considering what was a reasonable time, the situation of the parties and the nature of the transaction, and the particular facts involved should be considered (Stark v. Shaw, 155 Cal.App.2d 171, 177, 317 P.2d 182).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the amount of time spent by counsel in determining attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered a defendant's claim that the court erred in failing to stay a sentence pursuant to section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury that it could impose the death penalty only if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that death is appropriate? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Superior Court have authority to the effect that any fair, reasonable doubt concerning the existence of a municipal corporation's eminent domain power is resolved by the courts against the corporation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the rule of reasonableness in the context of the reasonable use doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
