What factors will the court consider in determining the admissibility of an expert opinion on voice identification?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Clark, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 554, 3 Cal.4th 41, 833 P.2d 561 (Cal. 1992):

As with eyewitness identification, some factors pertaining to voice identification might not be widely known or may be counterintuitive. We need not decide whether expert testimony may be proper as to these factors. (Cf. People v. McDonald (1984) 37 Cal.3d 351, 367-368, 208 Cal.Rptr. 236, 690 P.2d 709.) However, it is a matter of common experience that the ability to remember a perceptive experience diminishes over time. It is also generally known that voices may sound slightly different through different media. Expert opinion on these matters was not required to determine the admissibility of the voice identification under the totality of the circumstances. Especially given the fact that the witness was not available on the day of the hearing, the trial court did not abuse its discretion.

[3 Cal.4th 138] 3. Hearing on Brigges's Identification

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the Court considered the "great violence factor" as a factor in determining the appropriate sentence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court instruct the jury on the limited admissibility of statements relied on by Edinger, the expert who gave evidence at trial on the basis of an expert opinion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
What factors are considered by the California Supreme Court in determining whether to grant a dependency order? (California, United States of America)
Is an expert's need to consider extrajudicial matters, and a jury's need for information sufficient to evaluate an expert opinion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court considered the relevant factors in a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
Can the jury consider the importance of the age factor in determining whether or not the evidence should be considered "triple count" or "double count"? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.